Total Plays 6 - Last played by on 2010-08-01
| 11 May 2008 |
Ipsus 301 BCSuccessors (Antigonus) vs Successors (Seleucus)Historical Background
War CouncilAntigonus’ Successor Army (Use Greek blocks) Seleucus’ Successor Army (Use Eastern Kingdom blocks) Victory Special Rules |
| Last Updated on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 13:44 |
|
Re:115 Ipsus (301 BC)
Nov 12 2008 10:10:03 Eric S. Raymond wrote some comments about this scenario on his webpage. CLICK HERE to read full article.
This was the so-called "Battle of Kings", a pivotal confrontation in the Wars of Alexandrian Succession. I played the Seleucids. Antigonus's cavalry-heavy right moved aggressively against my left, which is what happened historically and completely logical given the order of battle. Ahistorically, my left got handled pretty roughly but did not entirely collapse. The Antigonids later sortied against my right flank and knocked it around pretty seriously as well. As in the original battle, moving my heavy infantry up the center proved decisive; they inflicted critical losses on the opposing line. My opponent cooperated by using a line command to move his center forward; I think, in retrospect, that this was an error. I think my opponent's attempts at flanking were entirely correct. The Antigonids need to hit hard, fast, and early while the Seleucids have no retreat room. The OB gives the Seleucids a significant advantage in a general engagement, especially if they can deploy the elephants in their rear line effectively. This scenario favors the Seleucids slightly, especially since they start with 6 command cards to the Antigonid 5. I don't think I'd change it, though; good tactics and execution by the Antigonids can negate the Seleucid advantage, and that challenge is what this scenario design is about. |
#377 |
Discuss this item on the forums. (1 posts)


