Home Maps / Scenarios Second Punic War (218-202 BC) 006 Lake Trasimenus (217 BC)
12 | 02 | 2012
Main Menu
Rules
Variants



Visitors

Today: 27
Yesterday: 151
Last Week: 1184
This Month: 2125
Last Month: 4769


JoomlaWatch Stats 1.2.9 by Matej Koval
006 Lake Trasimenus (217 BC) Print E-mail
( 6 Votes )
52.8 %
Record a victory for BOTTOM ARMY 47.2 %
Total Plays 36 - Last played by Tomek on 2011-08-25
Written by GMT Games   

11

May

2008

Lake Trasimenus 217 BC

* Carthaginians vs Romans

Historical Background
Much of Hannibal’s “genius” for warfare lay in his ability to take the measure of his opponents’ abilities and intentions. His opponent in 217 BC was Roman Consul Gaius Flaminius, a vain and incompetent patrician. Armed with this knowledge, Hannibal determined to set a trap for his opponent by ravaging the countryside to spur Flaminius to action. True to form, Flaminius rushed headlong into pursuit of Hannibal, marching his army through the narrow defile next to Lake Trasimenus where Hannibal’s army lay in wait. Hannibal posted his veteran infantry as a blocking force, hiding his light infantry and cavalry in the hills. As the day of battle dawned, a heavy mist covered the area – Flaminius further aided Hannibal’s plans by neglecting to send out scouts. The Roman vanguard stumbled into the Carthaginian blocking force, and the battle was joined. Almost immediately the ambushing Carthaginians descended from the hills and fell on the Roman column before the soldiers had enough time to deploy. Flaminius died early in the fighting; more than half of his army died along with him, either in the desperate fighting or drowning trying to escape. It was noteworthy that the only portion of Flaminius’s army to escape intact was the vanguard – those soldiers fought their way through Hannibal’s best infantry to do it. It surely was not through lack of bravery that the Roman army met disaster at Lake Trasimenus.
The stage is set. The battle lines are drawn and you are in command. The rest is history.

War Council

Army: Carthagian
Leader: Hannibal
6 Command Cards
Move First

Army: Roman
Leader: Flaminius
2* Command Cards

Victory
6 Banners

Special Rules
Lake Trasimenus is impassable.

The four steep hills hexes on the right side of the battlefield as noted, are impassable terrain.

The Roman player starts with 2 command cards. On turn 1 play one card, draw two cards. Roman player now holds 3 command cards. On turn 2 play one card, draw two cards. Roman player now holds 4 command cards. On turn 3 play one card, draw one card. Roman player hand size stays at 4 command cards for the rest of the battle.

Last Updated on Monday, 12 July 2010 15:50
 
Discuss (4 posts)
Re:006 Lake Trasimenus (217 BC)
Nov 30 2010 16:04:39
This scenario is very surprising. It does look hopeless for the Romans, but it is not.

I played a solo game as I am learning the VASSAL program. The game started with both sides pressing forward to respectively avoid the lake and utilize the lake.

The Carthaginians willingly moved the Warriors and Medium cavalry against the Roman left as they player had two "Order Medium Troops" cards in hand. Some dice rolls favorable to the Roman player and a bit of luck as the Romans were holding "Order Left Section" cards, and all 5 medium units were destroyed. The Romans lost 2 light units. A bit of shooting finished off a damaged Slinger and the Romans win 6-2.

I have played this twice before with narrow Carthaginian victories. The difference in this game seemed that the Carthaginian player had access to only one "Line Command" or "Double Time" card early in the game...and the Romans used a "Counterattack" to match it.

The best strategy for the Romans appears to be attacking the Carthaginian left aggressively. The Romans need two banners early or the Command Card difference will cause such a poor position, the game will be decided.

The best strategy for the Carthaginians seems to be to press in the center while protecting the cavalry units.
#1009
006 Lake Trasimenus (217 BC)
Oct 18 2010 21:18:10
A complete blowout for the Carthaginians, with the Romans failing to take a single flag. The Roman center first advance, losing Flaminius in the process, then the Roman right advanced but failed to break through. However, while the Carthaginians won decisively, it was a near-run thing - six of its units lost half or more of their strength and if the Romans had been able to push just a little harder it would have been a very different battle.
#951
006 Lake Trasimenus (217 BC)
Nov 13 2008 02:26:34
Solo Play:

This should have been a complete massacre of the Roman army. The opening hand for Carthage included a mounted charge as well as several cards to maintain a sustained attack on the Roman line. It started off strong with the Romans being cut to pieces. It was unclear if the Romans would even manage to get a single banner. Then the tide began to turn. Flaminius led his unit to slaughter several of the cavalry units including their leader. In the end, the Romans were a single block away from victory (they needed one more green hit, but the light cavalry evaded). The Carthaginian left did not fare very well, getting hit hard by a well played Clash of Shields to beat back their attack.

Carthage 6 - Rome 5

The Romans completely dominated this battle thanks to a well played Clash of Shields allowing 8 units to attack at +2 to take four banners for the win. More conflict on the Carthaginian left flank this time, but surprisingly only a single banner earned for each side. This is despite 10+ blocks of damage to each army. The cavalry charge on the right this time proved much less effective. The initial impact did almost no damage requiring four units to finish off an unsupported light infantry unit. Rome most likely would not have lasted too many more turns as they were severely weakened, but they stuck when they needed to.

Rome 6 - Carthage 3
#384
Re:006 Lake Trasimenus (217 BC)
Nov 12 2008 10:00:30
Eric S. Raymond wrote some comments about this scenario on his webpage. CLICK HERE to read full article.

First time I played this one was as a flip-flop set; the score was 6-3/4-6 and I lost.
In neither game did the Roman right/Carthaginian left see any combat at all. The Romans have to get their units off the lakeshore line or be dispersed by forced retreats. Conversely, the big variable for the Carthaginians is how quickly the warrior infantry can close with the Roman line and what damage they do when they get there.
I think this scenario is (despite its complexity) very well balanced, better so than the Crimissos, Bagradas, or Ticinus River Scenarios. I wouldn't change a thing.
#371

Discuss this item on the forums. (4 posts)

Other battles in Second Punic War (218-202 BC)

004 Ticinus River (218 BC)
005 Trebbia (218 BC)
C3i08 Cissa (218 BC)
C3i10 Umbria (217 BC)
EPIC07 Lake Trasimenus (217 BC)
JD88 Geronium (217 BC)
007 Cannae (216 BC)
X12 Deluxe Cannae (216 BC)
EPIC01 Cannae (216 BC)
X05 Ambush of Litana (216 BC)
JB07 Grumentum (215 BC)
008 Dertosa (Ebro) (215 BC)
EPIC06 Dertosa (215 BC)
C3i13 Caralis (215 BC)
GB05 Caralis (215 BC)
C3i07 Iliturgi (215 BC)
X47 Second Nola (215 BC)
009 2nd Beneventum (214 BC)
GB06 Third Nola (214 BC)
C3i09 Castrum Album (214 BC)
JD51 Tispasa (213 BC)
GB07 Acrillae (213 BC)
X48 Defeat of Syphax (213 BC)
X16 Herdonia (212 BC)
JD52 Siga (212 BC)
JD53 Tingis (212 BC)
JB08 Herdonia 1st (212 BC)
C3i04 Orongis (212 BC)
AC22 Ilorca (211 BC)
C3i14 Himeras River (211 BC)
JD54 Himeras River (211 BC)
010 Castulo (211 BC)
X20 Second Capua (211 BC)
JB09 Herdonia 2nd (210 BC)
X02 Numistro (210 BC)
GB08 Numistro (210 BC)
JR02 Canusium (209 BC)
011 Baecula (208 BC)
012 Metaurus (207 BC)
GC01 Metaurus (207 BC)
JB06 Grumentum (207 BC)
AC23 Grumentum (207 BC)
X43 Celt-Iberia (207 BC)
C3i05 Celtiberia (207 BC)
013 Ilipa (206 BC)
EPIC02 Ilipa (206 BC)
X06 Hippo Regius (205 BC)
AC24 Crotona (204 BC)
JD113 Crotona (204 BC)
C3i11 Agathocles Tower (204 BC)
X78 Tower of Agathocles (204 BC)
014 Great Plains (203 BC)
X08 The Great Plains (203 BC)
C3i12 Cirta (203 BC)
GB04 Cirta (203 BC)
X17 Po River (203 BC)
C3i06 Po River (203 BC)
GB15 Po River (203 BC)
015 Zama (202 BC)
EPIC04 Zama (202 BC)
X22 Deluxe Zama (202 BC)

By A Web Design