Home Forum
23 | 05 | 2012
Main Menu
Rules
Variants



Visitors



JoomlaWatch Stats 1.2.9 by Matej Koval
C&C: ANCIENTS
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Re:001 Akragas (406 BC) (1 viewing) (1) Guest
Go to bottom Post Reply Favoured: 0
TOPIC: Re:001 Akragas (406 BC)
#18
alecrespi (Admin)
Alea Iacta Est
Admin
Posts: 274
graph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Gender: Male alecrespi CCAncients Location: Italy Birthdate: 1978-07-31
001 Akragas (406 BC) 3 Years, 12 Months ago Karma: 4  
** This thread discusses the Content article: 001 Akragas (406 BC) **

 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
 
Last Edit: 2008/11/12 22:21 By alecrespi.
 
Alessandro Crespi - CCAncients.NET ADMIN
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#19
alecrespi (Admin)
Alea Iacta Est
Admin
Posts: 274
graph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Gender: Male alecrespi CCAncients Location: Italy Birthdate: 1978-07-31
Re:001 Akragas (406 BC) 3 Years, 12 Months ago Karma: 4  
This is the first scenario available in the base game. Usually Syracusan wins, so this could be a good playground for new players.
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
 
Alessandro Crespi - CCAncients.NET ADMIN
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#367
alecrespi (Admin)
Alea Iacta Est
Admin
Posts: 274
graph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Gender: Male alecrespi CCAncients Location: Italy Birthdate: 1978-07-31
Re:001 Akragas (406 BC) 3 Years, 6 Months ago Karma: 4  
Eric S. Raymond wrote some comments about this scenario on his webpage.
CLICK HERE to read full article.

This first scenario is a fairly straightforward power-vs.-maneuverability confrontation. If the Syracusan general can bring his heavy infantry to bear squarely against the opposing line, he will win. The Carthaginian must maneuver and hope to pick off five Syracusan light units before that happens.
I think the advantage is slightly with the Syracusans in this senario. Their missile troops have better range, which tends to prevent the Carthaginian skirmishers from doing much to disrupt the Syracusan heavies. And the only real mobile striking force Carthage has is the chariot and light-cavalry pair on his extreme left; a flank attack against the Syracusan right is thus about the only way Carthage has to secure the initiative. If that fails and the Syracusan makes no large exploitable errors afterward, he's got a lock.

This scenario could be rebalanced by giving the Carthaginians 6command cards rather than 5.
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
 
Last Edit: 2008/11/12 10:53 By alecrespi.
 
Alessandro Crespi - CCAncients.NET ADMIN
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#379
badweasel (User)
Legionary
Posts: 14
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
001 Akragas (406 BC) 3 Years, 6 Months ago Karma: 1  
Solo plays:

Carthage won this battle through the skilled use of ranged combat. Before the initial contact between the two groups of infantry, the Carthaginian light units peppered the Syracusan line managing to eliminate a heavy unit and severely damage another unit. The Syracusans were only able to get three full strength units in to combat. This should have been enough to crush the weaker Carthaginian army, but unfortunately it was not to be. The Carthaginian line held and then began to cut through the enemy ranks. It was a pretty lopsided battle due to the effectiveness of the Carthaginian harassment strategy.

Carthage 5 - Syracuse 0

The Carthaginian range attack this time was much more ineffective. The Syracusan line was able to advance with no casualties and then proceeded to crush Carthage's center. Near the end there was a chance for Carthage to turn the battle the other way, but they were unable to eliminate two heavy units instead damaging them and forcing them to retreat into protection. The MVP has to go to Daphnaeus, who led his heavy unit to smash through the Carthaginian line eliminating a whopping four units throughout the game! To win this one, I think Syracuse has to very aggressively advance their line to get their heavy units into combat.

Syracuse 5 - Carthage 2
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#793
King Billy (User)
Centurion
Posts: 23
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:001 Akragas (406 BC) 2 Years, 2 Months ago Karma: 1  
Our group played this three times today, each time with a Syracusan win. The Carthaginians can use their missle troops, but once the heavies get into battle they will carve up the Carthaginians easily.

The left flank of the Carthaginians is particularly weak. In all three games it collapsed. We considered a balance provision that would give the Cathaginians an extra unit (perhaps a light infantry or auxilary infantry) on that flank.

Still, it is a fun scenario and we all had a good time. There was no "walkover" 2 x 5-3 wins and 1 5-4 win.
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#1109
TomKnight3 (User)
Legionary
Posts: 3
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
001 Akragas (406 BC) 10 Months, 4 Weeks ago Karma: 0  
I just got the game about one month ago. We had three different players try it out. We all could win as Syracusan, but not Carthage. It did seem to level out our abilities.
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
Go to top Post Reply
Powered by FireBoardget the latest posts directly to your desktop